Skip to content

How Virginia's HB 395 stacks up against Utah's HB 340

The two earliest US plug-in solar statutes take different routes to the same destination. Virginia leans consumer-protection; Utah leans equipment.

Updated April 11, 2026 6 min read
Split composition of the Virginia and Utah state capitol buildings at blue hour

Context

Utah beat Virginia to the punch on effective date but not on passage. HB 395 cleared the Virginia General Assembly in 2024 with a delayed effective date to give the SCC time to build a rulemaking process. Utah's HB 340 passed a year later and took effect almost immediately — but without a comparable stakeholder process.

The result: Utah residents can plug in today; Virginia residents get a more thoroughly-negotiated set of protections in 2027.

Side-by-side

ProvisionVirginia HB 395Utah HB 340
System cap (AC)1,200 W1,200 W
Required certificationUL 3700UL 3700
Landlord restriction≥ 4-unit owners cannot unreasonably refuseSilent — landlord may refuse
HOA restrictionCannot prohibit; may regulate placementCannot prohibit; may regulate placement
Interconnection agreementNot requiredNot required
Utility notificationVoluntary, standardized formMandatory notification to utility
Net meteringNot eligibleNot eligible
Historic districtsLocal ARB may impose reasonable conditionsLocal historic authority may prohibit
Effective dateJan 1, 2027 (protections)May 1, 2025

What Virginia got right

Three provisions where HB 395 goes further than Utah:

  • Landlord restrictions with teeth. Virginia bars landlords owning 4+ units from unreasonably refusing plug-in solar. Utah is silent, meaning a Utah tenant's landlord can refuse for any reason or none.

  • Voluntary utility notification. HB 395 makes notification optional and standardized. HB 340 makes it mandatory, which introduces a compliance step Virginia doesn't impose.

  • Historic-district balance. Virginia allows local ARBs to impose reasonable conditions but not outright bans; Utah preserves local prohibition authority entirely.

What Utah got right

  • Immediate effect. HB 340 was live within 90 days of passage. Virginia residents wait until 2027 for the consumer-protection provisions.

  • Utility notification as data. Mandatory notification gives Utah utilities a clean dataset for distribution planning. Virginia's voluntary approach may leave utilities guessing at system saturation.

Stay in the loop

Stay updated on Virginia balcony solar

Get notified when the State Corporation Commission issues new HB 395 regulations, forms, or legal updates.

Was this article helpful?

Your feedback helps us keep this guide accurate and easy to use.